Finding 5 · 2026-08-16 (later)
A PASS was retracted as contamination four minutes after it was reported
Extending the pocket-knockout panel with 43 additional compounds reported a clean PASS — until checking the class labels found a wrong-target reference compound, natural products of unknown activity, unidentifiable IDs, and one alkaloid counted as twelve separate “actives.” Verified-only re-analysis came back INCONCLUSIVE.
What we expected
Extending the pocket-knockout panel with 43 additional compounds (mutant arm only) should give a cleaner read on whether Boltz-2's signal survives pocket destruction.
What happened
The merged panel reported a PASS — after-arm AUC 0.5156 [0.3775, 0.6495], upper bound finally under the 0.70 memorisation bar. Checking the class labels afterward found the panel was not what it claimed:
- Compound 78c (CD38 reference) — a different target entirely
- theobromine, apigenin, 2 glycosides — natural products, activity unknown
- 2 UUIDs, 2 bare numeric ids — unidentifiable
- 12 stereoisomers of one alkaloid — ONE molecule counted twelve times
All were labelled “active” by the rule 0 if name.startswith("decoy") else 1 — a rule that a morning audit the same day had already flagged as fragile, and that had not yet been fixed. Verified-only re-analysis: n=68, auc_after 0.5761 [0.4249, 0.7232] → INCONCLUSIVE.
Why it happened
The twelve stereoisomers — one molecule counted twelve times, more than half the added class — dropped hard under the knockout (0.85 → 0.20–0.46), pulling the after-arm AUC toward chance and manufacturing the collapse.
What changed
“A contaminated panel did not merely add noise — it moved the verdict, in the direction most flattering to this project's headline number.” Labels now require measured evidence: a measured potency against the specific target, a curated holdout, or membership in a named KNOWN_ACTIVES allowlist. Everything else is excluded with a printed reason. Commit d2050b1.
“Seventeenth defect of the day, and the first one that reached a stated conclusion before being caught. Every earlier one was found before it produced a number I published. This one I announced.”
Lab notebook, line 6383.
This is the standard we would hold your data to.
If that sounds like what your result needs, thirty minutes is enough to find out.